It is based on the fact that the negative comments which in turn attract more traffic to bring a direct link, it's the search strategy. You can read the full story, which prompted Google's decision to act on DecorMyEyes.com here.
The problem here is that Google has taken effective legislators and Amit Singhal, Google Fellow, the role, describes the thinking process, resulting in a "decoration of my eyes," the event is to jump to a niggle priority.
There are three facts, jump Amit post yesterday, the first Amit and his team was "shocked to read the" About "decorate my eyes" of the story, they "immediately convene a meeting" to look at this problem and have determine the "hundreds of other merchants," they consider a very bad user experience.
It shows (a) of the New York Times still has a huge influence, and (b) Google is the fire of the fraudulent activities and online credibility of the whole problem, rather than pro-active response (c) Google is the egg shell walking, because it is currently under investigation by the European Union as a small company, Foundem, complaining after being demoted from Google search.
Who is Amit mentioned that hundreds of the company? If they have begun to prosecute them or drag mud Google downgrade their own brands? Whether Google would be contrary to large companies active in transportation, utilities and telecommunications sectors? Interesting times indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment